dancingleaf: (Default)
[personal profile] dancingleaf
say Country A is having some internal difficulties, ethnic tensions etc.

AND they decide to kick out a bunch of people.

AND all of those people end up in refugee camps in Country B.

Now a bunch of nations, Countries C, D, E.... etc. say okay - we'll take in some of these 'refugees'

Does that mean that Countries C,D & E are politically sympathetic to Country A, or opposed to the policies of Country A. Or are they just sympathetic to the plight of the refugees and neither approve or disapprove of the way Country A is dealing with their internal issue?


I'd appreciate the insight.


I've always avoided political science questions.

As a historian it just always seemed to me to be - that's just the way it happened - I've generally avoided judgment calls like this.

Date: 2009-11-15 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faedreamer.livejournal.com
My guess would be C, they're sympathetic to the plight of the refugees. I mean it could be any of the above, or a combination of them, but my first thought if I read about such a thing would be that countries C D and E were likely just trying to help people in trouble.

Of course, politics doesn't work that way so it's probably some other answer not even listed, really. There's always ulterior motives in politics, no one does anything just to be nice.

Date: 2009-11-19 02:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] treehouse176.livejournal.com
Any or all of the three, depending on circumstances, I'd say.

Profile

dancingleaf: (Default)
dancingleaf

July 2018

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 07:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios